logo
Foshan Mingzhou Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd
english
français
Deutsch
Italiano
Русский
Español
português
Nederlandse
ελληνικά
日本語
한국
العربية
हिन्दी
Türkçe
bahasa indonesia
tiếng Việt
ไทย
বাংলা
فارسی
polski
quote
english
français
Deutsch
Italiano
Русский
Español
português
Nederlandse
ελληνικά
日本語
한국
العربية
हिन्दी
Türkçe
bahasa indonesia
tiếng Việt
ไทย
বাংলা
فارسی
polski
Home
about us
Company Profile
factory tour
quality control
Faq
products

Laser Pipe Cutting Machine

Aluminum Tube Cutting Machine

Metal Tube Laser Cutting Machine

CNC Laser Tube Cutter

Square Tube Cutting Machine

Punching And Cutting Machine

Semi Automatic Punching Machine
blogs
solutions
contact us
quote
home
about us
Company Profile
factory tour
quality control
Faq
products

Laser Pipe Cutting Machine

Aluminum Tube Cutting Machine

Metal Tube Laser Cutting Machine

CNC Laser Tube Cutter

Square Tube Cutting Machine

Punching And Cutting Machine

Semi Automatic Punching Machine
blogs
solutions
contact us
quote
Latest company case about
Solutions Details
Created with Pixso. Home Created with Pixso. solutions Created with Pixso.

Laser Tube Cutting Feed Method Efficiency Test Report

Laser Tube Cutting Feed Method Efficiency Test Report

2025-04-09

Mingzhou Smart Factory - Production Floor Test

Objective:
To compare cutting efficiency between front loading and side loading methods on our laser tube cutting system.

Test Parameters:

  • Tube specification: 23(W) × 11(H) × 0.4(T) mm, 6m length

  • Cutting speed: 6 meters/minute

  • Laser generator: 1500W

  • Assist gas: Compressed air

Methodology:
Real-world testing conducted with production equipment under standard operating conditions.

Analysis:
(See following section for detailed efficiency comparison between front/side loading)


1. Front Loading  

Cutting time:6 minute 38 seconds

  • Advantages:

    • Linear feeding mechanism, ideal for long tubes (e.g., 6m) in continuous processing.

    • No rotation or realignment needed; directly positions the tube for cutting.

    • Shorter feeding distance, fewer mechanical movements.

  • Performance:

    • Likely 10%-20% faster per cut cycle (feeding + cutting).

    • Optimal for batch cutting identical lengths.

    • latest company case about [#aname#]

2. Side Loading  

Cutting time:7 minute 11 seconds

  • Disadvantages:

    • Requires lateral movement for positioning, increasing setup time.

    • Thin-walled tubes (0.4mm) may need careful clamping to avoid deformation.

    • Lateral handling of 6m tubes risks vibration, requiring stabilization.

  • Niche Use Case:

    • More flexible for multi-angle cuts (e.g., beveling).

    • latest company case about [#aname#]

Conclusion

Front loading is faster for long, thin square tubes:

  • Estimated time savings: 15%-30% (varies by equipment precision and operator skill).

  • Recommended unless side loading is process-critical